首页> 外文OA文献 >Pricing and timing of consolidated deliveries in the presence of an express alternative: Financial and environmental analysis
【2h】

Pricing and timing of consolidated deliveries in the presence of an express alternative: Financial and environmental analysis

机译:在存在明确替代方案的情况下合并交付的定价和时间安排:财务和环境分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Shipment consolidation has been advocated by researchers and politicians as a means to reduce cost and improve environmental performance of logistics activities. This paper investigates consolidated transport solutions with a common shipment frequency. When a service provider designs such a solution for its customers, she faces a trade-off: to have the most time-sensitive customers join the consolidated solution, the frequency must be high, which makes it difficult to gather enough demand to reach the scale economies of the solution; but by not having the most time-sensitive customers join, there will be less demand per time unit, which also makes it difficult to reach the scale economies. In this paper we investigate the service provider's pricing and timing problem and the environmental implications of the optimal policy. The service provider is responsible for multiple customers' transports, and offers all customers two long-term contracts at two different prices: direct express delivery with immediate dispatch at full cost, or consolidated delivery at a given frequency at a reduced cost. It is shown that the optimal policy is largely driven by customer heterogeneity: limited heterogeneity in customers' costs leads to very different optimal policies compared to large heterogeneity. We argue that the reason so many consolidation projects fail may be due to a strategic mismatch between heterogeneity and consolidation policy. We also show that even if the consolidated solution is implemented, it may lead to a larger environmental impact than direct deliveries due to inventory build-up or a higher-than-optimal frequency of the consolidated transport. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. and Association of European Operational Research Societies (EURO) within the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). All rights reserved.
机译:研究人员和政治家提倡合并货运,以此来降低成本和改善物流活动的环境绩效。本文研究了具有常见装运频率的综合运输解决方案。当服务提供商为其客户设计这样的解决方案时,她面临一个折衷:要使时间最敏感的客户加入合并的解决方案,频率必须很高,这使得很难收集到足够的需求以达到规模解决方案的经济性;但是由于没有时间敏感性最高的客户加入,因此每个时间单位的需求将减少,这也使得很难达到规模经济。在本文中,我们研究了服务提供商的定价和时间问题以及最优政策对环境的影响。服务提供商负责多个客户的运输,并以两种不同的价格向所有客户提供两个长期合同:以全额费用直接快递并立即发货,或者以给定的频率以降低的成本进行合并交付。结果表明,最优策略很大程度上是由客户异质性驱动的:与大型异质性相比,有限的客户成本异质性导致了最优策略的差异。我们认为,这么多合并项目失败的原因可能是由于异质性和合并政策之间的战略不匹配。我们还表明,即使实施了整合解决方案,由于库存积压或整合运输的频率高于最佳频率,与直接交付相比,它可能对环境的影响更大。 (C)2015年Elsevier B.V.和国际运营研究学会联合会(IFORS)中的欧洲运营研究学会协会(EURO)。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号